The performance of two selection mechanisms used in the most popular variant of differential evolution, known as DE/rand/1/bin, are compared in the solution of constrained numerical optimization problems. Four performance measures proposed in the specialized literature are used to analyze the capabilities of each selection mechanism
to reach the feasible region of the search
space, to find the vicinity of the feasible global optimum
and the computational cost (measured by
the number of evaluations) required. Two parameters
of the differential evolution algorithm are
varied to determine the most convenient values.
A set of problems with different features is chosen
to test both selection mechanisms and some
findings are extracted from the results obtained.