The recent article by Seo et al, published in Circulation Research, presented many interesting aspects of the myocardium from mice lacking transient receptor potential canonical channels TRPC3 or TRPC6, from dystrophic animals, and their interaction with cGMP. These authors measured the muscle response to stretch, widely known as slow force response (SFR). We would like to comment only on one aspect of this study that, although it might sound trivial at first glance, it unnecessarily confuses a well-established mechanical response. The authors arbitrarily changed the widely accepted denomination of SFR2–14 by the term stress-stimulated contractility without any explanation to justify the change.