Subir material

Suba sus trabajos a SEDICI, para mejorar notoriamente su visibilidad e impacto

 

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.date.accessioned 2023-06-08T18:58:22Z
dc.date.available 2023-06-08T18:58:22Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.uri http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/154159
dc.description.abstract Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are foodborne pathogens, and beef cattle are recognized as the principal reservoir. The aims of this study were (1) to identify the most sensitive combination of selective enrichment broths and agars for STEC isolation in artificially inoculated ground beef samples, and (2) to evaluate the most efficient combination(s) of methods for naturally contaminated ground beef samples. A total of 192 ground beef samples were artificially inoculated with STEC and non-stx bacterial strains. A combination of four enrichment broths and three agars were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for STEC isolation from experimentally inoculated samples. Enrichments with either modified tryptic soy broth (mTSB) containing 8mg/L novobiocin (mTSB-8) or modified Escherichia coli (mEC) broth followed by isolation in MacConkey agar were the most sensitive combinations for STEC isolation of artificially inoculated samples. Independently, both enrichments media followed by isolation in MacConkey were used to evaluate ground beef samples from 43 retail stores, yielding 65.1% and 58.1% stx-positive samples by RT-PCR, respectively. No difference was observed in the isolate proportions between these two methods (8/25 [32%] and 8/28 [28.6%]). Identical serotypes and stx genotypes were observed in STEC strains isolated from the same samples by either method. In this study, no single enrichment protocol was sufficient to detect all STEC in artificially inoculated samples and had considerable variation in detection ability with naturally contaminated samples. Moreover, none of the single or combinations of multiple isolation agars used were capable of identifying all STEC serogroups in either artificially inoculated or naturally occurring STEC-contaminated ground beef. Therefore, it may be prudent to conclude that there is no single method or combination of isolation methods capable of identifying all STEC serogroups. en
dc.language en es
dc.title Isolation of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli from Ground Beef Using Multiple Combinations of Enrichment Broths and Selective Agars en
dc.type Articulo es
sedici.identifier.issn 1556-7125 es
sedici.creator.person Brusa, Victoria es
sedici.creator.person Piñeyro Piñeiro, Pablo Enrique es
sedici.creator.person Galli, Lucía es
sedici.creator.person Linares, Luciano Héctor es
sedici.creator.person Ortega, Emanuel Eneas es
sedici.creator.person Padola, Nora Lía es
sedici.creator.person Leotta, Gerardo Aníbal es
sedici.subject.materias Ciencias Veterinarias es
sedici.description.fulltext true es
mods.originInfo.place Instituto de Genética Veterinaria es
mods.originInfo.place Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la provincia de Buenos Aires es
sedici.subtype Articulo es
sedici.rights.license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
sedici.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
sedici.description.peerReview peer-review es
sedici.relation.journalTitle Foodborne Pathogens and Disease es
sedici.relation.journalVolumeAndIssue vol. 13, no. 3 es


Descargar archivos

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)