Busque entre los 168757 recursos disponibles en el repositorio
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-28T15:46:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-28T15:46:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21765 | |
dc.description.abstract | Metaheuristics are used as very good optimization methods and they imitate natural, biologic, social and cultural process. In this work, we evaluate and compare three different metaheuristics which are population-based: Genetic Algorithms, CHC and Scatter Search. They work with a set of solutions in contrast to trajectory-based metaheuristics which use an only solution. From a comparative analysis, we can infer that Genetic Algorithms and CHC algorithms can solve satisfactorily problems with a growing complexity. While Scatter Search provides high quality solutions but its computational effort is very high too. | en |
dc.language | en | es |
dc.subject | Heuristic methods | es |
dc.subject | Algorithms | es |
dc.subject | Biology and genetics | es |
dc.title | A phenotypic analysis of three population-based metaheuristics | en |
dc.type | Objeto de conferencia | es |
sedici.creator.person | Orellana, Alina | es |
sedici.creator.person | Minetti, Gabriela F. | es |
sedici.description.note | Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes (WASI) | es |
sedici.subject.materias | Ciencias Informáticas | es |
sedici.description.fulltext | true | es |
mods.originInfo.place | Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) | es |
sedici.subtype | Objeto de conferencia | es |
sedici.rights.license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) | |
sedici.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ | |
sedici.date.exposure | 2008-10 | |
sedici.relation.event | XIV Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación | es |
sedici.description.peerReview | peer-review | es |