Upload resources

Upload your works to SEDICI to increase its visibility and improve its impact

 

Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2019-10-04T15:31:25Z
dc.date.available 2019-10-04T15:31:25Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.uri http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/82735
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Resuscitation goals for septic shock remain controversial. Despite the normalization of systemic hemodynamic variables, tissue hypoperfusion can still persist. Indeed, lactate or oxygen venous saturation may be difficult to interpret. Our hypothesis was that a gastric intramucosal pH-guided resuscitation protocol might improve the outcome of septic shock compared with a standard approach aimed at normalizing systemic parameters such as cardiac index (CI). Methods: The 130 septic-shock patients were randomized to two different resuscitation goals: CI ≥ 3.0 L/min/m2 (CI group: 66 patients) or intramucosal pH (pHi) ≥ 7.32 (pHi group: 64 patients). After correcting basic physiologic parameters, additional resuscitation consisting of more fluids and dobutamine was started if specific goals for each group had not been reached. Several clinical data were registered at baseline and during evolution. Hemodynamic data and pHi values were registered every 6 hours during the protocol. Primary end point was 28 days' mortality. Results: Both groups were comparable at baseline. The most frequent sources of infection were abdominal sepsis and pneumonia. Twenty-eight day mortality (30.3 vs. 28.1%), peak Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System scores (32.6 ± 6.5 vs. 33.2 ± 4.7) and ICU length of stay (12.6 ± 8.2 vs. 16 ± 12.4 days) were comparable. A higher proportion of patients exhibited values below the specific target at baseline in the pHi group compared with the CI group (50% vs. 10.9%; P < 0.001). Of 32 patients with a pHi < 7.32 at baseline, only 7 (22%) normalized this parameter after resuscitation. Areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves to predict mortality at baseline, and at 24 and 48 hours were 0.55, 0.61, and 0.47, and 0.70, 0.90, and 0.75, for CI and pHi, respectively. Conclusions: Our study failed to demonstrate any survival benefit of using pHi compared with CI as resuscitation goal in septic-shock patients. Nevertheless, a normalization of pHi within 24 hours of resuscitation is a strong signal of therapeutic success, and in contrast, a persistent low pHi despite treatment is associated with a very bad prognosis in septic-shock patients. en
dc.language en es
dc.subject septic shock remain es
dc.subject pHguided resuscitation protocol es
dc.title Gastric tonometry versus cardiac index as resuscitation goals in septic shock: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial en
dc.type Articulo es
sedici.identifier.other doi:10.1186/cc7767 es
sedici.identifier.other eid:2-s2.0-65849238914 es
sedici.identifier.issn 1364-8535 es
sedici.creator.person Palizas, Fernando es
sedici.creator.person Dubin, Arnaldo es
sedici.creator.person Regueira, Tomas es
sedici.creator.person Bruhn, Alejandro es
sedici.creator.person Knobel, Elias es
sedici.creator.person Lazzeri, Silvio es
sedici.creator.person Baredes, Natalio es
sedici.creator.person Hernández, Glenn es
sedici.subject.materias Ciencias Médicas es
sedici.description.fulltext true es
mods.originInfo.place Facultad de Ciencias Médicas es
sedici.subtype Articulo es
sedici.rights.license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
sedici.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
sedici.description.peerReview peer-review es
sedici.relation.journalTitle Critical Care es
sedici.relation.journalVolumeAndIssue vol. 13, no. 2 es


Download Files

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)