What is a 'novel' mtDNA mutation - And does 'novelty' really matter?

Abstract

The hunt for pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations is often fueled by the seeming novelty of mutations that are either nonsynonymous or affect the protein synthesis machinery in patients. In order to determine the novelty of a detected mutation, the working geneticist nearly always consults MITOMAP - often exclusively. By reanalyzing some case studies of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts, prostate cancer, and hearing impairment, we demonstrate that the practice of solely relying on MITOMAP can be most misleading. A notorious example is the T1243C mutation, which was assessed to be novel and deemed to be associated with some (rare) disease simply because researchers did not realize that T1243C defines a deep branch in the Eurasian mtDNA phylogeny. The majority of 'novel' mutations suspected of being pathogenic are in actual fact known (and presumably neutral) polymorphisms (although unknown to MITOMAP), and this becomes glaringly evident when proper database searches and straightforward Internet queries are carried out.