Busque entre los 166918 recursos disponibles en el repositorio
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-20T16:40:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-20T16:40:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/85808 | |
dc.description.abstract | Information on public attitudes towards the use of transgenic trees in forest plantations is important in the decision-making process and policy implementation for safe tree development, particularly at the EU level. In Europe, the use of transgenic forest trees is very limited and therefore such information is completely lacking. To address this issue within the FP0905 European COST Action on the Biosafety of Transgenic Forest Trees a pioneer cross-country pilot survey on public attitudes towards the use of transgenic forest trees was conducted using young population as a focus group. This was decided mainly because this focus group represents the future consumers, policy makers or developers. Specifically, the survey aimed to: i) assess the level of young people’s knowledge about transgenic forest trees, ii) identify issues of concern to them regarding the cultivation of transgenic forest trees and iii) explore whether they approve or disapprove of the use of transgenic forest trees in plantations. Purposive sampling was performed and university students of different disciplines were included in the research as sampling subjects. In total, 1868 completed questionnaires from 15 European and non-European countries were analyzed. The young educated people that took part in the survey appeared to approve of the use of transgenic forest trees in plantations and would be willing to buy forest transgenic products. The potential loss of biodiversity due to a risk of gene flow between transgenic and wild trees was seen as the safety issue of most concern when considering the commercial release of transgenic forest trees. However, a serious perceived lack of knowledge about potential benefits and risks of the cultivation of transgenic forest trees was recorded in most of the countries. K-means clustering was implemented on respondents’ positive responses to identify potential country patterns. No differences in patterns of public attitude towards the acceptance of the commercial growing of transgenic forest trees were observed between European and non-European countries. Extended research on public attitude issues towards the use of transgenic forest trees is strongly recommended as a basis for policy implementation on safe tree development. | en |
dc.format.extent | 344-353 | es |
dc.language | en | es |
dc.subject | GM forest trees | es |
dc.subject | K-means clustering | es |
dc.subject | Public acceptance | es |
dc.subject | Public awareness | es |
dc.subject | University students | es |
dc.title | Public attitudes towards the use of transgenic forest trees: a crosscountry pilot survey | en |
dc.type | Articulo | es |
sedici.identifier.other | doi:10.3832/ifor1441-008 | es |
sedici.identifier.other | eid:2-s2.0-84964524338 | es |
sedici.identifier.issn | 1971-7458 | es |
sedici.creator.person | Sharry, Sandra Elizabeth | es |
sedici.description.note | La lista completa de autores que integran el documento puede consultarse en el archivo | es |
sedici.subject.materias | Ciencias Agrarias | es |
sedici.subject.materias | Ingeniería Forestal | es |
sedici.description.fulltext | true | es |
mods.originInfo.place | Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales | es |
sedici.subtype | Articulo | es |
sedici.rights.license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) | |
sedici.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
sedici.description.peerReview | peer-review | es |
sedici.relation.journalTitle | IForest | es |
sedici.relation.journalVolumeAndIssue | vol. 9 | es |
sedici.rights.sherpa | * Color: gray * Pre-print del autor: unknown * Post-print del autor: unknown * Versión de editor/PDF:unknown * Condiciones: >>This publisher's policies have not been checked by Color. >>DOAJ says it is an open access journal, but this may only mean that it is freely available to read. >>Most open access publishers also permit self-archiving and re-use, but some do not. >>Do not assume that self-archiving is allowed, unless it is published under a Creative Commons license. >>Please contact the publisher for further information if necessary >>Email romeo@jisc.ac.uk if you wish to suggest adding this publisher properly to Color. * Link a Sherpa: http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1971-7458/es/ |