Busque entre los 168858 recursos disponibles en el repositorio
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-03T16:20:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-03T16:20:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/86675 | |
dc.description.abstract | The increasing number of publications on recommender systems for Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) evidence a growing interest in their development and deployment. In order to support learning, recommender systems for TEL need to consider specific requirements, which differ from the requirements for recommender systems in other domains like e-commerce. Consequently, these particular requirements motivate the incorporation of specific goals and methods in the evaluation process for TEL recommender systems. In this article, the diverse evaluation methods that have been applied to evaluate TEL recommender systems are investigated. A total of 235 articles are selected from major conferences, workshops, journals, and books where relevant work have been published between 2000 and 2014. These articles are quantitatively analysed and classified according to the following criteria: type of evaluation methodology, subject of evaluation, and effects measured by the evaluation. Results from the survey suggest that there is a growing awareness in the research community of the necessity for more elaborate evaluations. At the same time, there is still substantial potential for further improvements. This survey highlights trends and discusses strengths and shortcomings of the evaluation of TEL recommender systems thus far, thereby aiming to stimulate researchers to contemplate novel evaluation approaches. | en |
dc.format.extent | 326-344 | es |
dc.language | en | es |
dc.subject | Evaluation | es |
dc.subject | K Computing Milieux | es |
dc.subject | K.3 Computers and Education | es |
dc.subject | K.3.1 Computer Uses in Education | es |
dc.subject | K.3.1.d Distance learning | es |
dc.subject | Recommender Systems | es |
dc.subject | Survey | es |
dc.subject | Technology Enhanced Learning | es |
dc.title | Evaluating Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning: A Quantitative Survey | en |
dc.type | Articulo | es |
sedici.identifier.other | doi:10.1109/TLT.2015.2438867 | es |
sedici.identifier.other | eid:2-s2.0-84961828621 | es |
sedici.identifier.issn | 1939-1382 | es |
sedici.creator.person | Erdt, Mojisola | es |
sedici.creator.person | Fernández, Alejandro | es |
sedici.creator.person | Rensing, Christoph | es |
sedici.subject.materias | Informática | es |
sedici.description.fulltext | true | es |
mods.originInfo.place | Laboratorio de Investigación y Formación en Informática Avanzada | es |
sedici.subtype | Articulo | es |
sedici.rights.license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) | |
sedici.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
sedici.description.peerReview | peer-review | es |
sedici.relation.journalTitle | IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies | es |
sedici.relation.journalVolumeAndIssue | vol. 8, no. 4 | es |
sedici.rights.sherpa | * Color: green * Pre-print del autor: can * Post-print del autor: can * Versión de editor/PDF:cannot * Condiciones: >>Author's pre-print on any website or pre-print server >>Author's post-print on author's personal website or employer's website or IEEE approved not-for-profit third party (8.1.9.G.2 ) website or Institutional repository >>Author's pre-print must be replaced by the accepted version, if on the author's personal website, employer's websites, arXiv, IEEE-approved third-party, not-for profit server, funder repository >>Author's pre-print must removed on third-party servers >>Author's pre-print must be accompanied with set phrase (see policy) before acceptance >>Author's pre-print must be accompanied with set phrase (see policy) when accepted for publication >>If funding agency rules apply, authors may post author's post-print version on funder's designated repository, in compliance with their funding agency rules. They may be required to comply with embargo periods of 0 to 24 months >>Publisher copyright and source must be acknowledged with citation (see policy) >>Must link to publisher version with DOI >>Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used >>Author's post-print on scholarly collaboration networks that have signed STM Sharing Principles >>Publisher retains copyright >>Publisher last contacted on 24/01/2018 * Link a Sherpa: http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1939-1382/es/ |