Subir material

Suba sus trabajos a SEDICI, para mejorar notoriamente su visibilidad e impacto

 

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-17T16:53:59Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-17T16:53:59Z
dc.date.issued 2008-01
dc.identifier.uri http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/131277
dc.description.abstract Immunoassays are the most commonly used quantitative techniques to determine the gliadin content of food aimed at coeliac patients. Though the minimal amount of gliadins inducing the typical histopathological changes at the intestinal mucosa in coeliacs is still a matter of debate, current research is focussed on the development of methods having higher sensitivities. One of the main drawbacks in gliadin analysis is the low efficiency of the conventional extraction procedure using 60% ethanol. The use of reducing (2-mercaptoethanol) and denaturing (guanidinium chloride) agents has been recommended to improve the extraction efficiency. Owing to the well-known effects of these agents on native conformation of proteins, and their widely reported interference on the antigen/antibody interaction in other systems, we assessed whether gliadin detection by immunoassays is affected by the presence of those agents. Using two ELISA formats with a panel of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, we found that recognition by specific antibodies of partially or totally denatured gliadins is severely impaired. The magnitude of the interference depends on the antibodies used and the ELISA format. The impact of such interference was analysed for each step of the immunoassays. 2-mercaptoethanol had a stronger effect than guanidinium chloride, and the antigen became almost undetectable for some assays when both reagents were used in combination. Remarkably, since quantitative results are obtained by comparison with a calibration curve using a native antigen, there is no equivalence between the antigen/antibody interaction occurring in the sample and that in the standard gliadin, leading to underestimation of the actual gliadin content. Therefore, we suggest that not only the effects of reducing and denaturing agents on the antigen during the extraction procedure, but also the effects of residual amounts of these agents on the antigen/antibody interaction should be considered when a quantitative immunoassay is performed. en
dc.format.extent 591-602 es
dc.language en es
dc.subject Gliadin analysis es
dc.subject ELISA es
dc.subject Coeliac disease es
dc.subject Antigen denaturation es
dc.title Interference of denaturing and reducing agents on the antigen/antibody interaction en
dc.type Articulo es
sedici.identifier.other doi:10.1007/s00217-007-0597-9 es
sedici.identifier.issn 1438-2377 es
sedici.identifier.issn 1438-2385 es
sedici.title.subtitle Impact on the performance of quantitative immunoassays in gliadin analysis en
sedici.creator.person Doña, Vanina Valeria es
sedici.creator.person Fossati, Carlos Alberto es
sedici.creator.person Chirdo, Fernando Gabriel es
sedici.subject.materias Ciencias Exactas es
sedici.description.fulltext true es
mods.originInfo.place Facultad de Ciencias Exactas es
mods.originInfo.place Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Sistema Inmune es
sedici.subtype Articulo es
sedici.rights.license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
sedici.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
sedici.description.peerReview peer-review es
sedici.relation.journalTitle European Food Research and Technology es
sedici.relation.journalVolumeAndIssue vol. 226, no. 3 es


Descargar archivos

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)